I've been listening to a couple of Brookner audiobooks.
Joanna David's take on The Rules of Engagement is competent, and her middle-class tones suit the character of the novel's narrator. But there's a complacency to her reading, too cosy for a novel as dark and late as this.
Diana Quick is the ideal reader of Undue Influence. Her accent is RP, but less strident than David's. Quick's tone has a lowered, falling quality, appropriate for this sad novel. There's also a slight accent, not traceable, possibly just the effect of clipping. There are other actresses who display this: Eleanor Bron, say, or Siân Phillips. Quick's is an older woman's voice. Claire, the narrator of Undue Influence, is meant to be twenty-nine. Yet her storytelling always feels as if long in retrospect, though the novel is set in the modern day. This isn't the only example in Brookner of an unsettling freewheeling as to chronology.
There's no evidence of Anita Brookner herself performing or recording her work. Her own voice was peculiar. I remember it distinctly from my own meeting with her.
It may have been the product of an immigrant background. It was a deep voice, the accent old-style RP. Her enunciation gave it, further, a vague foreign quality, though Brookner was born, bred and schooled in England. When she studied in Paris as a young woman, her landlady identified her as solidly English (see here).
On the BBC Reunion radio show, available in the UK on BBC Sounds, Brookner's delivery isn't out of place alongside the vocal idiosyncrasies of fellow Courtauldians Neil MacGregor and Brian Sewell. Maybe it's an art historian thing.
A critic once said no one else will ever write like Anita Brookner. No one, probably, will speak like her either.
Comments