As noted in a recent post (here), I'm fond of Professor Emma Smith's lecture series on Shakespeare and his contemporaries. Highbrow but accessible, these talks contribute to our continued appreciation of early-modern drama. Professor Smith builds on the curatorial work of commentators over the years, not least in the eighteenth century, when Johnson, Pope and the Shakespeare Ladies Club argued for the preeminence and rehabilitation of the 'Bard'.
Professor Smith extends her mission through popular media, appearing regularly on literary podcasts.
In one such, on being asked why she loves Shakespeare, Professor Smith responds, Do I? Do I really love Shakespeare?
She goes on: Shakespeare is a thing to think with. I adore the conversations it makes possible.
A thing to think with. It's a thought-provoking remark, relevant to fandoms of all kinds. It helps me understand my own 'love' of Brookner. I don't read her all the time. I have many other interests. But reading and knowing her work has helped me understand and think about things that would otherwise have been closed to me. I don't just mean intertexts, those authors Brookner prompts us to read. I mean the worlds her work opens up, the ideas and of course the conversations it provokes.
Comments