Insiders out. Outsiders in, ran the header to a
review of one of Brookner’s novels. But was she so much of an outsider? Did she
not praise the reckless, the feckless, the careless? Did she not promote the riotous
lives of the gods of antiquity? Didn’t she reject other, kinder philosophies? Whose
side was she on? With whom, ultimately, did she throw in her lot?
The
way to proceed, she once told us, was to start as an outsider, briefly to
become an insider, and at last to resume the status of an outsider. That way
the work got done.
Brookner
said that in a review of Edmund White’s biography of Marcel Proust in the Sunday Times in 1999. Outsiders
chiefly, sometime insiders too, consummate dandies both. As always Brookner
chose her subjects with extreme precision.
Comments
Post a Comment
Questions and comments are always welcome. (Please note: there will be a short delay before publication, as comments are moderated.) Alternatively, to message directly, please email brooknerian@gmail.com