I've been what you might call an Anita Brookner fan for
more than twenty-five years, but looking back through my reading records I find
I haven't read her all the time. Whole years went by. During the period in which she
published annually, each year's novel might be my only Brookner. But I kept the
faith in other ways, stayed true to authors she revered. At one time I loved
Trollope. For years I anaesthetised myself with those long Victorian novels.
When I came to the end of a novel I would feel angst-ridden and unmoored unless
I had another to hand. Anthony Trollope himself was known to start writing his
next book almost the very day after he had finished the last. There was
obsession, there was neurosis, in such an arrangement, surely, and there was in
mine too. But the novels of Anthony Trollope, I recall, gave me lots of pleasure. He got me
beyond youth. Patiently and diligently I followed the careers of his churchmen
and politicians. I grew discreet and inward, like Plantagenet Palliser. I also
loved the byways of Trollope’s novels, chapters and groups of chapters in which
the plot meandered far and wide, into unexpected places. This sets me wondering
about the experience of reading certain authors. Reading the novels of Anita
Brookner is a particular experience. One feels immersed, one feels overcome,
one feels seduced. The rhythms of the sentences, the paragraphs, the chapters
gradually exert a hold. It is almost physical. One's pulse, one's breathing slows.
One has entered an altered state, and is at Brookner's mercy.
The much-loved Backlisted podcast ( here ) returns with a 'lockdown' episode that includes a lot of Anita Brookner talk. Prompted by discussion about Hotel du Lac , never the most representative Brookner, the chat meanders pleasantly on to the potential for compiling an Anita Brookner 'Top Ten'. At a loose end myself, though this week at the chalkface entertaining the children of keyworkers, I considered the question myself. I'm sure there are similar such lists elsewhere on this blog - I forget, and I don't particularly want to consult them anyhow. Of course, Brookner - like Henry James, like Trollope, indeed like many prolific authors - passed through phases. Brookner's novels, I contend, fall into three, neatly divided by the decades she wrote in: the raw, vital 80s; the settled magisterial 90s; the bleak, experimental 2000s. A Brookner novel from the 80s seems very different from any of her final works - just as 'James I', 'James II' ...
Comments
Post a Comment
Questions and comments are always welcome. (Please note: there will be a short delay before publication, as comments are moderated.) Alternatively, to message directly, please email brooknerian@gmail.com